|
|
Post by JakesSnakes on Mar 22, 2009 18:46:07 GMT -5
Please select one option. I want to hear all of your input.
|
|
|
|
Post by Regal Homer on Mar 22, 2009 19:15:57 GMT -5
I'd like to see 7 bench spots. I gave reasons in another post but I would like to keep the player pool that little bit stronger. I believe that we need to make decisions on players and the more spots we have, the more we can just hoard players. Since teams play 6 games per week, there is usually only 1 day where a sub is needed. Hitters on the bench are primarily reserve players and not as essential.
|
|
|
|
Post by Elyria Elite on Mar 22, 2009 19:51:08 GMT -5
I like the idea of a 25 man roster. It keeps the teams as close to an actual major league team as possible.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stick and Balls on Mar 22, 2009 21:37:29 GMT -5
i say 6 or 7 it makes it more challenging
|
|
|
|
Post by goingyard on Mar 23, 2009 23:10:58 GMT -5
I agree with Homer there would be slim picking in the free agent pool if we go any higher
|
|
|
|
Post by steveb3 on Mar 23, 2009 23:15:38 GMT -5
I agree with lowering the bench spots for reasons above. Mainly the free agent pool only b/c i was in a fantasy basketball league and the benches were so big that the only people in the f/a pool were like 11th and 12th men from the benches and it got rather boring...
|
|
|
|
Post by JakesSnakes on Mar 28, 2009 11:00:49 GMT -5
although i prefer 8, it looks like i will be changing the bench spots down to 7..
|
|
|
|
Post by JakesSnakes on Mar 28, 2009 11:11:06 GMT -5
ok, changed. for some reason it reset the draft order so i had to change that back (in case anyone wonders why it says i changed the order in the league page).
|
|
|
|
Post by thecloser on Mar 28, 2009 11:53:31 GMT -5
I think 7 is a better number,,,I agree with Homer's insight on the waiver pool
|
|
